<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squatting in residential properties to be criminalised within months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becoming criminal at home &#171; Actualités Alternatives &#171; Je veux de l&#039;info</title>
		<link>http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Becoming criminal at home &#171; Actualités Alternatives &#171; Je veux de l&#039;info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squashcampaign.org/?p=1769#comment-134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] government consultation was an undemocratic sham: 96 per cent of respondents did not want the homeless to be criminalized. This included the Police Association, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] government consultation was an undemocratic sham: 96 per cent of respondents did not want the homeless to be criminalized. This included the Police Association, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Reclaiming whose city? - MULE</title>
		<link>http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Reclaiming whose city? - MULE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squashcampaign.org/?p=1769#comment-114</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] act of dissent against the creeping loss of community spaces in central Manchester and also against new plans to criminalise squatting in residential properties, which passed through the House of Lords last Tuesday 27 March. Squatting has historically been [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] act of dissent against the creeping loss of community spaces in central Manchester and also against new plans to criminalise squatting in residential properties, which passed through the House of Lords last Tuesday 27 March. Squatting has historically been [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inevitable, but terrible nonetheless &#171; militantmoments</title>
		<link>http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Inevitable, but terrible nonetheless &#171; militantmoments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squashcampaign.org/?p=1769#comment-101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] REBLOGGED FROM SQUASH (http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] REBLOGGED FROM SQUASH (<a href="http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/" rel="nofollow">http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/</a>) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You can&#8217;t object, we did a consultation. &#171; unnecessary, insufficient</title>
		<link>http://www.squashcampaign.org/2012/03/all-over-squatting-in-residential-properties-criminalised/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>You can&#8217;t object, we did a consultation. &#171; unnecessary, insufficient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squashcampaign.org/?p=1769#comment-100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] process of taking the change through Parliament was also enormously undemocratic, as described here &#8211; the clause was tacked onto a bulky criminal bill just three days before it went through the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] process of taking the change through Parliament was also enormously undemocratic, as described here &#8211; the clause was tacked onto a bulky criminal bill just three days before it went through the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
